Christopher Hare

956 citations
30 papers · 550 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Hare

25 papers receiving 504 citations

Peers

Christopher Hare
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Communication 118
  • Political Science and International Relations 303
  • General Decision Sciences 16
  • General Social Sciences 25
  • Sociology and Political Science 221
Replace Kjersten Nelson with:
Kjersten Nelson United States
David Schwieder United States
Kabir Khanna United States
Buddy Peyton United States
Marcus Holmes United States
Damon M. Cann United States
Irving Crespi United States
Rasmus T. Pedersen Denmark
Douglas J. Ahler United States
Young Mie Kim United States
Christopher Hare relative to Kjersten Nelson United States Kjersten Nelson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Kjersten Nelson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Hare

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Hare's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Hare with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Hare more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Hare

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Hare. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Hare. The network helps show where Christopher Hare may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Hare, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Hare Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Hare links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014132
2 2014128
3 201469
4 201058
5 202022
6 202019
7 202117
8 201213
9
Ellinger's Modern Banking Law
201113
10 201311
11 202010
12 20159
13 20197
14 20187
15 20226
16 20186
17 20124
18 20204
19 20233
20 20152

About Christopher Hare

Christopher Hare is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Economics and Econometrics and Law, having authored 30 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (14 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (3 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (118 citations), Political Science and International Relations (303 citations), General Decision Sciences (16 citations), General Social Sciences (25 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (221 citations). Christopher Hare has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Keith T. Poole, Ryan Bakker, David Armstrong, Royce Carroll, Howard L. Rosenthal, TJ Gibson, James E. Monogan, Robert Lupton, Bradford Jones and J. Mark Wrighton. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science Quarterly, The Cambridge Law Journal, Public Choice, Politics & Gender and British Journal of Political Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact