Chris Mathes

683 citations
22 papers · 587 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Chris Mathes

22 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Chris Mathes
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Sensory Systems 85
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 235
  • Molecular Biology 424
  • Physiology 25
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 98
Replace Karen N. Bradley with:
Karen N. Bradley United Kingdom
Fujian Lu China
Katina Lazarow Germany
Katsuo Okazaki Japan
Takahiro Yasuda Japan
Mylène Robert France
Sunday A. Abiria United States
Viktor Yarotskyy United States
Brian L. Gerhardstein United States
Barbara Schuricht Germany
Chris Mathes relative to Karen N. Bradley United Kingdom Karen N. Bradley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Karen N. Bradley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Mathes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Mathes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Mathes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Mathes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Mathes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Mathes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Mathes. The network helps show where Chris Mathes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Mathes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Mathes Line = papers co-authored together Chris Mathes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998100
2 200674
3 199460
4 199644
5 200943
6 199438
7 200534
8 200129
9 199526
10 200824
11 199523
12 199119
13 199318
14 199312
15 199211
16 200810
17 19979
18 20036
19 19933
20 20192

About Chris Mathes

Chris Mathes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Sensory Systems and Pharmacology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (10 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (85 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (235 citations), Molecular Biology (424 citations), Physiology (25 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (98 citations). Chris Mathes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Stuart H. Thompson, Andrea Fleig, Reinhold Penner, Dafna Singer‐Lahat, Christian C. Felder, William F. Gilly, Yi Liu, Michael Finley, Mathew Brock and Samuel S.‐H. Wang. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of General Physiology, SLAS DISCOVERY, American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets and Biochemical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact