Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets

2.2k papers and 72.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets in the last decades have received a total of 72.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets usually cover Molecular Biology (1.1k papers), Oncology (482 papers) and Immunology (355 papers) specifically the topics of Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (88 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (77 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets are James Turkson, Libero Santarpia, Adel K. El‐Naggar, Scott M. Lippman, Philip Seeman, Peter Traxler, Claudiu T. Supuran, Theresa L. Whiteside, Kenji Hashimoto and Alexander H. Stegh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets.

Countries where authors publish in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025