Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change

69k citations
870 papers · · active since 2009

Impact in

Papers in

    • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance 184
    • Climate variability and models 114
    • Climate Change and Geoengineering 33
    • Climate Change and Sustainable Development 30
    • Climate Change Policy and Economics 227

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change

845 papers receiving 65.4k citations

Peers

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Global and Planetary Change 26.9k
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 5k
  • Atmospheric Science 4.8k
  • Ecological Modeling 788
  • Sociology and Political Science 15.8k
Replace Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability with:
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability United States
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change United States
One Earth United States
Geography Compass United Kingdom
Geographical Analysis United States
Environmental Development United States
Conservation Letters United States
Advances in Climate Change Research China
Climate Risk Management United States
Earth System Dynamics Germany
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change relative to Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability United States Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change.

About Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change

The 870 papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change in the last decades have received a total of 69k indexed citations . Papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change usually cover Global and Planetary Change (370 papers), Economics and Econometrics (230 papers), General Energy (9 papers), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (57 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (238 papers) specifically the topics of Climate Change Policy and Economics (227 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (184 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (145 papers), Climate variability and models (114 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (34 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (33 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (33 papers) and Climate Change and Sustainable Development (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change are Aiguo Dai, Susanne C. Moser, Markku Rummukainen, Elke U. Weber, Francis W. Zwiers, David Schlosberg, Gabriele Clarissa Hegerl, Kyle Powys Whyte, Blair C. Trewin and Karen L. O’Brien.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact