Chongwei Wang

15 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers

Chongwei Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 162
  • Applied Psychology 68
  • Communication 79
  • Computer Science Applications 47
  • Information Systems and Management 44
Replace Cynthia Lee with:
Cynthia Lee United States
Francisco G. Barbeite United States
Serafina Pastore Italy
Otmar E. Varela United States
Margaret C. Lohman United States
Shelda Debowski Australia
Andrew B. Artis United States
Nilda Palma‐Rivas United States
Erik Henderickx Belgium
Janine van der Rijt Netherlands
Chongwei Wang relative to Cynthia Lee United States Cynthia Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Cynthia Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chongwei Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chongwei Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chongwei Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chongwei Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chongwei Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chongwei Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chongwei Wang. The network helps show where Chongwei Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chongwei Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chongwei Wang Line = papers co-authored together Chongwei Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2006317
2 200470
3 200767
4 201048
5 202111
6 20228
7 20226
8 20204
9 20224
10 20232
11 20232
12 20252
13 20251
14 20231
15
Conflict Management Styles: How Do Japanese, Koreans, and Filipinos Differ from One Another
20061

About Chongwei Wang

Chongwei Wang is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Forestry and Communication, having authored 15 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (3 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (2 papers), Optical Network Technologies (2 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (2 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (1 paper), Poisoning and overdose treatments (1 paper) and Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (162 citations), Applied Psychology (68 citations), Communication (79 citations), Computer Science Applications (47 citations) and Information Systems and Management (44 citations). Chongwei Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Raymond A. Noe, Howard J. Klein, Meina Liu, Brian R. Dineen, Tae‐Yeol Kim, Mari Kondo, Zefeng Wang, Zhen Ming Peng, Xiaoling Xu and Cheng Sheng. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Conflict Management, Cancer Medicine, Frontiers in Oncology, Optics & Laser Technology and BioMed Research International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact