Chloë De Witte
Impact in
- Small Animals top 5%
- Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases
- Microbiology top 10%
Papers in
- Surgery 14
- Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies 14
-
- Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases 7
- Co-authors
- Freddy Haesebrouck (19 shared papers)Annemieke Smet (11 shared papers)Richard Ducatelle (8 shared papers)Bram Flahou (4 shared papers)Elien Van Wonterghem (1 shared paper)Bernard Taminiau (3 shared papers)Lies De Groef (1 shared paper)Ine Vlaeminck (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Chloë De Witte
20 papers receiving 369 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Small Animals 75
- Microbiology 41
- Biological Psychiatry 11
- Surgery 174
- Endocrinology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Chloë De Witte
This map shows the geographic impact of Chloë De Witte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloë De Witte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloë De Witte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chloë De Witte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloë De Witte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloë De Witte. The network helps show where Chloë De Witte may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chloë De Witte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 20 | The effect of the liver on the gastric secretion stimulated with gastrin II and gastrin-like substances in human. | 1972 | 2 |
About Chloë De Witte
Chloë De Witte is a scholar working on Surgery, Small Animals, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (14 papers), Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (7 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (4 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (2 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper), Galectins and Cancer Biology (1 paper), Vibrio bacteria research studies (1 paper) and Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (75 citations), Microbiology (41 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations), Surgery (174 citations) and Endocrinology (20 citations). Chloë De Witte has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Portugal and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Freddy Haesebrouck, Annemieke Smet, Richard Ducatelle, Bram Flahou, Elien Van Wonterghem, Bernard Taminiau, Lies De Groef, Ine Vlaeminck, Keimpe Wierda and Samir EL Andaloussi. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Research, Helicobacter, Veterinary Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology and Journal of Personalized Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.