This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Helicobacter. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Helicobacter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helicobacter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Helicobacter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Helicobacter.
About Helicobacter
The 2.2k papers published in Helicobacter in the last decades have received a total of 67.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Helicobacter usually cover Surgery (2.2k papers), Health Informatics (5 papers), Molecular Medicine (12 papers), Gastroenterology (12 papers) and Food Science (28 papers) specifically the topics of Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (2.1k papers), Gut microbiota and health (35 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (31 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (17 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (15 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (11 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Helicobacter are David Yates Graham, Yoshio Yamaoka, Javier P. Gisbert, Françis Mégraud, Philippe Lehours, Anthony T. R. Axon, Colm A O'Morain, Peter Malfertheiner, Francesco Franceschi and Antonio Gasbarrini.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.