This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Helicobacter. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Helicobacter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helicobacter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Helicobacter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Helicobacter.
About Helicobacter
The 2.1k papers published in Helicobacter in the last decades have received a total of 60.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Helicobacter usually cover Surgery (1.8k papers), Gastroenterology (101 papers), Small Animals (82 papers), Immunology (140 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (98 papers) specifically the topics of Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (1.8k papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (164 papers), Galectins and Cancer Biology (120 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (88 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (83 papers), Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (81 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (42 papers) and Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Helicobacter are David Y. Graham, Javier P. Gisbert, Yoshio Yamaoka, Philippe Lehours, Françis Mégraud, Anthony Axon, Peter Malfertheiner, Francesco Franceschi, Antonio Gasbarrini and Hermann Brenner.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.