Ching‐Kuan Liu

2.5k citations
90 papers · 1.9k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Kuan Liu

89 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Ching‐Kuan Liu
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 293
  • Neurology 130
  • Neurology 161
  • Physiology 281
  • Biological Psychiatry 26
Replace Danuta Ryglewicz with:
Danuta Ryglewicz Poland
Marco Canevelli Italy
Helen Macpherson Australia
Simona Gabriella Di Santo Italy
Che‐Sheng Chu Taiwan
Costas A. Anastasiou Greece
Mauro Ceccanti Italy
Byung‐Cheul Shin South Korea
Kornelia Kędziora–Kornatowska Poland
Willa D. Brenowitz United States
Ching‐Kuan Liu relative to Danuta Ryglewicz Poland Danuta Ryglewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Danuta Ryglewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Kuan Liu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Kuan Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Kuan Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Kuan Liu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Kuan Liu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Kuan Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Kuan Liu. The network helps show where Ching‐Kuan Liu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Kuan Liu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Kuan Liu Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Kuan Liu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019127
2 2009113
3 1998105
4 201288
5 201181
6 201573
7 201171
8 201160
9 201259
10 200950
11 200850
12 201544
13 201438
14 200435
15 201632
16 200630
17 201028
18 201328
19 201827
20 201427

About Ching‐Kuan Liu

Ching‐Kuan Liu is a scholar working on Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Epidemiology, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (18 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (12 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (8 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (293 citations), Neurology (130 citations), Neurology (161 citations), Physiology (281 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (26 citations). Ching‐Kuan Liu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ruey‐Tay Lin, Chiou‐Lian Lai, Chung‐Yao Hsu, Cheng‐Fang Hsieh, Li‐Min Liou, Mei‐Chuan Chou, Poyin Huang, Chun‐Hung Chen, Chih‐Ta Tai and Yuan‐Han Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology, Clinical Neurophysiology, The Neurologist, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Geriatrics and gerontology international.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact