Wei‐Chen Lin
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Gin‐Chung Liu (15 shared papers)Ju‐Yu Yen (6 shared papers)Chih‐Hung Ko (6 shared papers)Cheng‐Fang Yen (5 shared papers)Cheng‐Sheng Chen (6 shared papers)Sigmund Hsiao (1 shared paper)Ming‐Jen Yang (1 shared paper)I‐Chan Chiang (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Intestinal Research (5 papers)Medicine (4 papers)Journal of Psychiatric Research (3 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)ChemBioChem (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Wei‐Chen Lin
91 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Wei‐Chen Lin's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Applied Psychology 127
- Genetics 169
- Clinical Psychology 280
- Sociology and Political Science 637
- Cognitive Neuroscience 245
Countries citing papers authored by Wei‐Chen Lin
This map shows the geographic impact of Wei‐Chen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wei‐Chen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wei‐Chen Lin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wei‐Chen Lin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wei‐Chen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wei‐Chen Lin. The network helps show where Wei‐Chen Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wei‐Chen Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brain activities associated with gaming urge of online gaming addiction Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 540 |
| 2 | 2004 | 237 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 146 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 125 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 125 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 81 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 53 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 46 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 41 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 31 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 31 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 29 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 24 |
About Wei‐Chen Lin
Wei‐Chen Lin is a scholar working on Genetics, Neurology, Surgery, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inflammatory Bowel Disease (20 papers), Microscopic Colitis (12 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (6 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (4 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (127 citations), Genetics (169 citations), Clinical Psychology (280 citations), Sociology and Political Science (637 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (245 citations). Wei‐Chen Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Gin‐Chung Liu, Ju‐Yu Yen, Chih‐Hung Ko, Cheng‐Fang Yen, Cheng‐Sheng Chen, Sigmund Hsiao, Ming‐Jen Yang, I‐Chan Chiang, Chia‐Ying Lu and Yu‐Ting Kuo. Their work appears in journals such as Intestinal Research, Medicine, Journal of Psychiatric Research, PLoS ONE and ChemBioChem.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.