Chia-Ching Chen

35 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Chia-Ching Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Biomaterials 66
  • Health 26
  • General Health Professions 72
  • Finance 21
  • Periodontics 8
Replace J Cassidy with:
J Cassidy United Kingdom
Hao Mei China
Xian Chen China
Haoyu Wen China
Kaining Zhang China
Meijin Huang China
Sasmit Sarangi United States
Thilagavathi Ramamoorthy India
LI Ming-hui China
Chia-Ching Chen relative to J Cassidy United Kingdom J Cassidy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.5×
J Cassidy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chia-Ching Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chia-Ching Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chia-Ching Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chia-Ching Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chia-Ching Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chia-Ching Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chia-Ching Chen. The network helps show where Chia-Ching Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chia-Ching Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chia-Ching Chen Line = papers co-authored together Chia-Ching Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201079
2 201654
3 201154
4 201129
5 201224
6 201418
7 201718
8 202117
9 200616
10 201715
11 200914
12 201513
13 201813
14 201412
15 201911
16 201011
17 20128
18 20068
19 20107
20 20216

About Chia-Ching Chen

Chia-Ching Chen is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Economics and Econometrics, Rheumatology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Care Issues (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (2 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (2 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (66 citations), Health (26 citations), General Health Professions (72 citations), Finance (21 citations) and Periodontics (8 citations). Chia-Ching Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Tetsuji Yamada, Jia‐Cherng Horng, Hiroshi Hirai, Katsunori Kondo, Toshiyuki Ojima, Chiyoe Murata, Tadashi Yamada, John J. Smith, Kuo‐Chu Hwang and Jih Ru Hwu. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Resuscitation, Frontiers in Public Health, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact