Cheng‐Chen Chang

713 citations
39 papers · 432 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Cheng‐Chen Chang

30 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

Cheng‐Chen Chang
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Biological Psychiatry 99
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 144
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
  • Aging 11
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 73
Replace Krisztina Mekli with:
Krisztina Mekli United Kingdom
Eva Kitzlerová Czechia
Odette Peerbooms Netherlands
John J. Worthington United States
Graziela Amboni Brazil
M. Picchetti Italy
Paola Merlo Italy
Paolo Olgiati Italy
Regan Patrick United States
Pâmela Ferrari Brazil
Cheng‐Chen Chang relative to Krisztina Mekli United Kingdom Krisztina Mekli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Krisztina Mekli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheng‐Chen Chang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheng‐Chen Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheng‐Chen Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheng‐Chen Chang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheng‐Chen Chang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheng‐Chen Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheng‐Chen Chang. The network helps show where Cheng‐Chen Chang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheng‐Chen Chang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheng‐Chen Chang Line = papers co-authored together Cheng‐Chen Chang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201190
2 201584
3 201464
4 201932
5 201619
6 200319
7 201017
8 201814
9 202413
10 20119
11 20119
12 20228
13 20186
14 20216
15 20215
16 20205
17 20165
18 20225
19 20224
20 20113

About Cheng‐Chen Chang

Cheng‐Chen Chang is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 39 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (3 papers) and Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (99 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (144 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations), Aging (11 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (73 citations). Cheng‐Chen Chang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Ta‐Tsung Lin, Chin‐San Liu, Shaw‐Hwa Jou, Te‐Jen Lai, Nan‐Ying Chiu, Shun-Chieh Yu, David C. Steffens, Brian D. Boyd, Warren D. Taylor and Martha E. Payne. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of The Nutrition Society and Psychosomatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact