Charles Teo
Impact in
-
- Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
- Genetics top 2%
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus 30
- Epidemiology 29
- Meningioma and schwannoma management 25
- Co-authors
- Robert Jones (3 shared papers)Peter Nakaji (9 shared papers)Michael E. Sughrue (20 shared papers)Salim Ur Rahman (4 shared papers)David A. Wilson (4 shared papers)Bernard Kwok (4 shared papers)Michael Kundi (2 shared papers)Michael Carlberg (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- World Neurosurgery (12 papers)Child s Nervous System (10 papers)Neurosurgery (9 papers)Brain and Behavior (7 papers)Operative Neurosurgery (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Charles Teo
120 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 833
- Genetics 339
- Biological Psychiatry 77
- Neurology 383
- Biophysics 124
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Teo
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Teo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Teo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Teo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Teo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Teo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Teo. The network helps show where Charles Teo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles Teo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 122 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 178 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 128 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 122 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 104 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 90 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 80 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 79 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 74 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 74 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 64 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 63 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 56 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 55 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 53 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 52 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 51 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 45 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 42 |
About Charles Teo
Charles Teo is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Genetics, Neurology and Surgery, having authored 122 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (30 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (25 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (25 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (14 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (12 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (8 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (833 citations), Genetics (339 citations), Biological Psychiatry (77 citations), Neurology (383 citations) and Biophysics (124 citations). Charles Teo has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Jones, Peter Nakaji, Michael E. Sughrue, Salim Ur Rahman, David A. Wilson, Bernard Kwok, Michael Kundi, Michael Carlberg, Frederick A. Boop and Vini G. Khurana. Their work appears in journals such as World Neurosurgery, Child s Nervous System, Neurosurgery, Brain and Behavior and Operative Neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.