Operative Neurosurgery

3.3k papers and 46.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.3k papers published in Operative Neurosurgery in the last decades have received a total of 46.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Operative Neurosurgery usually cover Neurology (1.6k papers), Surgery (1.5k papers) and Epidemiology (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Meningioma and schwannoma management (930 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (747 papers) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (571 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Operative Neurosurgery are Robert F. Spetzler, Albert L. Rhoton, Paul A. Gardner, Carl H. Snyderman, Amin Kassam, Michael Y. Wang, Ricardo L. Carrau, Theodore H. Schwartz, Michael T. Lawton and Daniel M. Prevedello.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Operative Neurosurgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Operative Neurosurgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Operative Neurosurgery.

Countries where authors publish in Operative Neurosurgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Operative Neurosurgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Operative Neurosurgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Operative Neurosurgery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025