Charles More

26 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Charles More
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Public Administration 144
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 97
  • Archeology 10
  • Management Information Systems 47
  • Economics and Econometrics 132
Replace Daniel Nelson with:
Daniel Nelson United States
Clair Brown United States
John Dearlove United Kingdom
J. E. T. Eldridge United Kingdom
John Fenwick United Kingdom
Michel Albert Norway
Mark R. Rutgers Netherlands
Steve Martin United Kingdom
Peter Feuille United States
Wolfgang Seibel Germany
Charles More relative to Daniel Nelson United States Daniel Nelson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Daniel Nelson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles More

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles More's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles More with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles More more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles More

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles More. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles More. The network helps show where Charles More may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Charles More, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles More Line = papers co-authored together Charles More links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983311
2 198249
3 200249
4 198934
5 198133
6 198318
7
Some observations on 'ancient' mining at Phalaborwa
197410
8 199210
9 198710
10 19909
11 19868
12 19877
13 19926
14 19824
15
Black Gold: Britain and Oil in the Twentieth Century
20094
16 19834
17
The industrial age
19893
18 19962
19 20142
20
The Industrial Age: Economy and Society in Britain, 1750-1985
19892

About Charles More

Charles More is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Control and Systems Engineering, Anthropology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (5 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Mining Techniques and Economics (2 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (2 papers), Education Systems and Policy (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper) and Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (144 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (97 citations), Archeology (10 citations), Management Information Systems (47 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (132 citations). Charles More has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Craig R. Littler, Frank Hearn, Robert Fitzgerald, Jenny Morris, Pat Hudson, Jonathan Zeitlin, Royden Harrison, D. McGinnis, Roger Penn and Stuart Macintyre. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, Labour / Le Travail, Labour History, Business History and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact