Charles Li
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
-
- Analytic Number Theory Research
Papers in
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 7
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 7
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 4
- Retinal and Macular Surgery 3
- Co-authors
- Flora Lum (20 shared papers)Rahul N. Khurana (5 shared papers)Luke Y. C. Chen (2 shared papers)Philip A. Collender (5 shared papers)Marshall L. Stoller (1 shared paper)Clayton J. Radke (1 shared paper)Andrew R. Crothers (1 shared paper)Justin V. Remais (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Ophthalmology Retina (7 papers)Ophthalmology (7 papers)Psychiatric Services (3 papers)Acta Arithmetica (2 papers)American Journal of Ophthalmology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Charles Li
56 papers receiving 587 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Ophthalmology 82
- Algebra and Number Theory 36
- Health Informatics 7
- Mathematical Physics 48
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 14
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Li. The network helps show where Charles Li may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 46 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 11 |
About Charles Li
Charles Li is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Geometry and Topology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Geometry (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (7 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (4 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (3 papers) and Retinal and Macular Surgery (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (82 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (36 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Mathematical Physics (48 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (14 citations). Charles Li has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Flora Lum, Rahul N. Khurana, Luke Y. C. Chen, Philip A. Collender, Marshall L. Stoller, Clayton J. Radke, Andrew R. Crothers, Justin V. Remais, Changhong Yang and Qu Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology Retina, Ophthalmology, Psychiatric Services, Acta Arithmetica and American Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.