Charles Li

952 citations
58 papers · 583 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Charles Li

55 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

Charles Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Ophthalmology 82
  • Algebra and Number Theory 28
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Mathematical Physics 37
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 11
Replace Wanting Zhao with:
Wanting Zhao China
Felix Günther Germany
Alberto Modenese Italy
Zhenyu Wang China
GJ Johnson United States
Chun‐Ju Lin Taiwan
Jude R. Hayes United States
Stanley Von Hagen United States
Yan Lv China
Peter Valentin Tomazic Austria
Charles Li relative to Wanting Zhao China Wanting Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Wanting Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Li. The network helps show where Charles Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Li Line = papers co-authored together Charles Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200443
2 201941
3 201733
4 201929
5 201827
6 201924
7 202323
8 202323
9 202323
10 201022
11 202019
12 201518
13 200617
14 202116
15 201116
16 202115
17 201113
18 202211
19 202411
20 201911

About Charles Li

Charles Li is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Rheumatology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (7 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (6 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (5 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (3 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (3 papers) and Retinal and Macular Surgery (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (82 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (28 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Mathematical Physics (37 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (11 citations). Charles Li has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Flora Lum, Rahul N. Khurana, Luke Y. C. Chen, Philip A. Collender, Marshall L. Stoller, Qu Cheng, Song Liang, David W. Killilea, Justin V. Remais and Changhong Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology Retina, Psychiatric Services, Acta Arithmetica and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact