Daniel Chow

94 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Daniel Chow's Hit Papers

Deep-Learning Convolutional Neural Networks Accurately Classify Genetic Mutations in Gliomas 2018 · 360 citations
3600+2+5Years since publication100200300

Peers

Daniel Chow
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Health Informatics 137
  • Genetics 578
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.1k
  • Neurology 314
  • Neurology 260
Replace Suyash Mohan with:
Suyash Mohan United States
Matthew Li United States
Sotirios Bisdas Germany
Omar Arnaout United States
Sung Soo Ahn South Korea
Nickolas Papanikolaou Greece
David Bonekamp Germany
Nicole Aucoin United States
Ken Chang United States
Ian F. Dunn United States
Daniel Chow relative to Suyash Mohan United States Suyash Mohan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Suyash Mohan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Chow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Chow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Chow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Chow. The network helps show where Daniel Chow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Chow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Chow Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Chow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Deep-Learning Convolutional Neural Networks Accurately Classify Genetic Mutations in Gliomas
Hit paper breakdown →
2018360
2 2018216
3 2019178
4 2016127
5 2020107
6 201789
7 201989
8 201988
9 201980
10 201973
11 201170
12 202066
13 201562
14 202059
15 201659
16 201357
17 201757
18 202054
19 202153
20 202049

About Daniel Chow

Daniel Chow is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Epidemiology and Neurology, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (19 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (15 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (11 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (7 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (6 papers), Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (6 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (5 papers) and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (137 citations), Genetics (578 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.1k citations), Neurology (314 citations) and Neurology (260 citations). Daniel Chow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Christopher G. Filippi, Peter Chang, Peter Chang, Min‐Ying Su, Jack Grinband, Brent D. Weinberg, Michelle Bardis, Daniela A. Bota, Yang Zhang and Angela Lignelli. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Neuroradiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Frontiers in Neurology and Academic Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact