Charles Keith

1.8k citations
60 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Charles Keith

56 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Charles Keith
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Cell Biology 529
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 336
  • Developmental Neuroscience 59
  • Biophysics 72
  • Molecular Biology 798
Replace Steven R. Heidemann with:
Steven R. Heidemann United States
W. J. Hage Netherlands
Alvin Telser United States
Adam G. Hendricks United States
David G. Capco United States
Harumasa Okamoto Japan
Chang Y. Chung United States
Nisha Patel United States
David W. Maughan United States
Virginie Georget France
Charles Keith relative to Steven R. Heidemann United States Steven R. Heidemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Steven R. Heidemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Keith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Keith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Keith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Keith. The network helps show where Charles Keith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles Keith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Keith Line = papers co-authored together Charles Keith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983175
2 1985146
3 1983145
4 1960103
5 198193
6 198487
7 198185
8 198750
9 200547
10 200746
11 201846
12 198543
13 200043
14 200137
15 198035
16 199231
17 198229
18 199029
19 198729
20 199829

About Charles Keith

Charles Keith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering and Genetics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (6 papers), Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (5 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (4 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (529 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (336 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (59 citations), Biophysics (72 citations) and Molecular Biology (798 citations). Charles Keith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Frederick R. Maxfield, Michael L. Shelanski, Benjamin Tycko, Mario DiPaola, M. L. Shelanski, Mark T. Wilson, A. Bajer, James R. Feramisco, William S. Kisaalita and Rajiv R. Ratan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cell Biology, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, BioTechniques, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact