Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology

191.9k citations
4.8k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms
    • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
    • RNA Research and Splicing
    • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Aging top 2%

Papers in

    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 758
    • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry 367
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 347
    • RNA modifications and cancer 303
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms 295
    • RNA Research and Splicing 295
    • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 404

Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology

4.4k papers receiving 158.0k citations

Peers

Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Molecular Biology 114.8k
  • Aging 2.7k
  • Genetics 40.0k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 6.0k
  • Cell Biology 14.9k
Replace PLoS Computational Biology with:
PLoS Computational Biology United States
Frontiers in Physiology United States
BioEssays United States
Journal of Experimental Zoology United States
Journal of Theoretical Biology United States
Biochemical Society Transactions United Kingdom
Methods United States
FEBS Journal United States
Journal of Visualized Experiments United States
Experimental Biology and Medicine United States
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology relative to PLoS Computational Biology United States PLoS Computational Biology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
PLoS Computational Biology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.

About Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology

The 4.8k papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology in the last decades have received a total of 191.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (2.9k papers), Genetics (1.0k papers), Aging (53 papers), Cell Biology (340 papers) and Immunology (414 papers) specifically the topics of RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (758 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (438 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (404 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (367 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (347 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (303 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (295 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (295 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology are Gail Hutchinson, Charles A. Janeway, J G Sutcliffe, Barbara McClintock, Jürgen Aschoff, F Jacob, Colin S. Pittendrigh, D. L. D. Caspar, A. Klug and Jacques Monod.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact