Charles Goodman
Impact in
- Religious studies top 2%
- Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- War, Ethics, and Justification
Papers in
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 8
-
- War, Ethics, and Justification 4
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
- Co-authors
- Aaron P. Schultz (1 shared paper)Jan Westerhoff (1 shared paper)Jay L. Garfield (1 shared paper)Graham Priest (1 shared paper)Koji Tanaka (1 shared paper)Scott A. Jenkins (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy East and West (3 papers)Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (1 paper)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)Sophia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Charles Goodman
19 papers receiving 107 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Religious studies 49
- Philosophy 55
- Cognitive Neuroscience 52
- Social Psychology 32
- Anthropology 11
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Goodman
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Goodman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Goodman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Goodman. The network helps show where Charles Goodman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Charles Goodman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 3 | RESENTMENT AND REALITY: BUDDHISM ON MORAL RESPONSIBILITY | 2002 | 17 |
| 4 | 2004 | 15 | |
| 5 | Moonpaths: Ethics and Emptiness | 2015 | 11 |
| 6 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 8 | Ethics in indian and tibetan buddhism | 2010 | 4 |
| 9 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 11 | Consequentialism, Agent-Neutrality, and Mahayana Ethics | 2013 | 2 |
| 12 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 0 |
About Charles Goodman
Charles Goodman is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 135 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (8 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (4 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (49 citations), Philosophy (55 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (52 citations), Social Psychology (32 citations) and Anthropology (11 citations). Charles Goodman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Aaron P. Schultz, Jan Westerhoff, Jay L. Garfield, Graham Priest, Koji Tanaka and Scott A. Jenkins. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, The Philosophical Quarterly, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Sophia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.