Brook Ziporyn

508 citations
32 papers · 130 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Brook Ziporyn

24 papers receiving 96 citations

Peers

Brook Ziporyn
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Religious studies 40
  • Cultural Studies 22
  • Philosophy 28
  • Sociology and Political Science 99
  • History and Philosophy of Science 5
Replace Jane Geaney with:
Jane Geaney United States
Bryan van Norden United States
Keiji Nishitani Japan
Lee H. Yearley United States
Jeremy Begbie United Kingdom
Irene Bloom United States
Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki
Paul S. Fiddes United Kingdom
Mark Wynn United Kingdom
Tom J. F. Tillemans Switzerland
Brook Ziporyn relative to Jane Geaney United States Jane Geaney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Jane Geaney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brook Ziporyn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brook Ziporyn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brook Ziporyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brook Ziporyn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brook Ziporyn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brook Ziporyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brook Ziporyn. The network helps show where Brook Ziporyn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Brook Ziporyn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brook Ziporyn Line = papers co-authored together Brook Ziporyn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200332
2 201220
3 199814
4
Being and Ambiguity: Philosophical Experiments with Tiantai Buddhism
200410
5 20138
6
Evil and/or/as the Good: Omnicentrism, Intersubjectivity, and Value Paradox in Tiantai Buddhist Thought
20007
7
Anti-Chan Polemics in Post Tang Tiantai
19945
8 20084
9 20004
10 19933
11 20033
12
Emptiness and Omnipresence: An Essential Introduction to Tiantai Buddhism
20163
13 20132
14 20032
15 20211
16 20121
17 20171
18 20181
19 20001
20 20001

About Brook Ziporyn

Brook Ziporyn is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 32 papers that have together received 130 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (22 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (5 papers), Japanese History and Culture (3 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (1 paper), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper), Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper), Marxism and Critical Theory (1 paper) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (40 citations), Cultural Studies (22 citations), Philosophy (28 citations), Sociology and Political Science (99 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (5 citations). Brook Ziporyn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter D. Hershock. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, The Journal of Asian Studies, Common Knowledge, Journal of Indian Philosophy and Philosophy Compass.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact