Brook Ziporyn
Impact in
- Religious studies top 2%
- Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Japanese History and Culture
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 25
- China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations 1
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Peter D. Hershock (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy East and West (5 papers)Philosophy Compass (1 paper)Dao (1 paper)Common Knowledge (1 paper)Journal of Indian Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Brook Ziporyn
28 papers receiving 130 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Religious studies 55
- Cultural Studies 34
- Philosophy 40
- Sociology and Political Science 141
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 15
Countries citing papers authored by Brook Ziporyn
This map shows the geographic impact of Brook Ziporyn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brook Ziporyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brook Ziporyn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brook Ziporyn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brook Ziporyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brook Ziporyn. The network helps show where Brook Ziporyn may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Brook Ziporyn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 4 | Evil and/or/as the Good: Omnicentrism, Intersubjectivity, and Value Paradox in Tiantai Buddhist Thought | 2000 | 13 |
| 5 | Being and Ambiguity: Philosophical Experiments with Tiantai Buddhism | 2004 | 12 |
| 6 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 10 | Anti-Chan Polemics in Post Tang Tiantai | 1994 | 5 |
| 11 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 14 | Emptiness and Omnipresence: An Essential Introduction to Tiantai Buddhism | 2016 | 3 |
| 15 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 2 |
About Brook Ziporyn
Brook Ziporyn is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (25 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (5 papers), Japanese History and Culture (4 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper), China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (1 paper), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (1 paper) and Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (55 citations), Cultural Studies (34 citations), Philosophy (40 citations), Sociology and Political Science (141 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (15 citations). Brook Ziporyn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter D. Hershock. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Philosophy Compass, Dao, Common Knowledge and Journal of Indian Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.