Mark Wynn
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology
- Health top 10%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Papers in
- Philosophy 24
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology 14
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 14
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6
-
- Religion, Ecology, and Ethics 6
- Religion and Society Interactions 4
- Theological Perspectives and Practices 4
- Co-authors
- Paul S. Fiddes (1 shared paper)Michael Lloyd (1 shared paper)Christopher Southgate (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Religious Studies (7 papers)International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (3 papers)Faith and Philosophy (3 papers)European Journal for Philosophy of Religion (2 papers)The Heythrop Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Wynn
37 papers receiving 171 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Philosophy 127
- Health 41
- Religious studies 28
- Social Psychology 53
- Geography, Planning and Development 12
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Wynn
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Wynn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Wynn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Wynn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Wynn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Wynn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Wynn. The network helps show where Mark Wynn may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Mark Wynn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 47 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 6 | God and Goodness: A Natural Theological Perspective | 1999 | 12 |
| 7 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 19 | God and Goodness | 2001 | 2 |
| 20 | 2020 | 2 |
About Mark Wynn
Mark Wynn is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development, Religious studies and Social Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Karl Barth and Christian Theology (14 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (14 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (9 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (6 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Theological Perspectives and Practices (4 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (127 citations), Health (41 citations), Religious studies (28 citations), Social Psychology (53 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (12 citations). Mark Wynn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul S. Fiddes, Michael Lloyd and Christopher Southgate. Their work appears in journals such as Religious Studies, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Faith and Philosophy, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion and The Heythrop Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.