Mark Wynn
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Religious studies top 5%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Papers in
- Philosophy 21
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology 12
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 12
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6
- Study and Philosophy of Religion 3
-
- Religion, Ecology, and Ethics 5
- Religion and Society Interactions 2
- Co-authors
- Christopher Southgate (1 shared paper)Paul S. Fiddes (1 shared paper)Michael Lloyd (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Religious Studies (5 papers)Faith and Philosophy (3 papers)International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (3 papers)The Heythrop Journal (2 papers)European Journal for Philosophy of Religion (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Wynn
31 papers receiving 133 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Philosophy 96
- Religious studies 26
- Health 22
- History and Philosophy of Science 8
- Social Psychology 30
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Wynn
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Wynn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Wynn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Wynn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Wynn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Wynn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Wynn. The network helps show where Mark Wynn may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Mark Wynn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 25 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 5 | God and Goodness: A Natural Theological Perspective | 1999 | 10 |
| 6 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 17 | God and Goodness | 2001 | 2 |
| 18 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 2 |
About Mark Wynn
Mark Wynn is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development, Religious studies and History, having authored 38 papers that have together received 159 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Karl Barth and Christian Theology (12 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (12 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (6 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (5 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (3 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (96 citations), Religious studies (26 citations), Health (22 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations) and Social Psychology (30 citations). Mark Wynn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Southgate, Paul S. Fiddes and Michael Lloyd. Their work appears in journals such as Religious Studies, Faith and Philosophy, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, The Heythrop Journal and European Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.