Cem Başlevent

36 papers receiving 537 citations

Peers

Cem Başlevent
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Political Science and International Relations 243
  • Public Administration 33
  • Gender Studies 84
  • Sociology and Political Science 286
  • Social Psychology 104
Replace Raymond Tatalovich with:
Raymond Tatalovich United States
Mark D. Ramirez United States
Elisa Reis Brazil
Brian Newman United States
Alexander C. Pacek United States
Marco Gießelmann Germany
Mark Gibney United States
Vladimir Shlapentokh United States
Kai Gehring Switzerland
Mario Quaranta Italy
Cem Başlevent relative to Raymond Tatalovich United States Raymond Tatalovich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Raymond Tatalovich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cem Başlevent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cem Başlevent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cem Başlevent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cem Başlevent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cem Başlevent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cem Başlevent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cem Başlevent. The network helps show where Cem Başlevent may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Cem Başlevent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cem Başlevent Line = papers co-authored together Cem Başlevent links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201479
2 200560
3 200451
4 201341
5 200940
6 201332
7 200529
8 201128
9 201028
10 201520
11 200420
12 201619
13 201116
14 200913
15 201211
16 200611
17 200310
18
Recent Trends in Informal Employment in Turkey
20159
19
Preferences for early retirement among older government employees in Egypt
20097
20 20087

About Cem Başlevent

Cem Başlevent is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 38 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Turkey's Politics and Society (9 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (6 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (5 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (5 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (243 citations), Public Administration (33 citations), Gender Studies (84 citations), Sociology and Political Science (286 citations) and Social Psychology (104 citations). Cem Başlevent has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United States and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Hasan Kirmanoğlu, Özlem Onaran, Ali T. Akarca, Meltem Dayıoğlu, Jan‐Erik Lönnqvist, Guido Alessandri, Michele Vecchione, Jo Silvester, Shalom H. Schwartz and Cătălin Mamali. Their work appears in journals such as Social Indicators Research, Party Politics, European Journal of Political Research, International Journal of Social Welfare and Regional Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact