Celia Smith
Impact in
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Papers in
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 7
- Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 3
- Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer 1
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 1
-
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 7
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 5
- Co-authors
- Rainer Cramer (9 shared papers)Ali Tiss (7 shared papers)Stéphane Camuzeaux (6 shared papers)John F. Timms (6 shared papers)Ian Jacobs (6 shared papers)Usha Menon (6 shared papers)Nicole Parker (1 shared paper)Roderick Clifton‐Bligh (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Clinical Chemistry (1 paper)The American Journal of Surgical Pathology (1 paper)BMC Bioinformatics (1 paper)Analytical Chemistry (1 paper)PROTEOMICS (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Celia Smith
10 papers receiving 303 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Gastroenterology 92
- Spectroscopy 88
- Neurology 58
- Cancer Research 54
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 101
Countries citing papers authored by Celia Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Smith. The network helps show where Celia Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celia Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 150 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 5 | Early detection of ovarian cancer in samples pre-diagnosis using CA125 and MALDI-MS peaks. | 2012 | 17 |
| 6 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 1 |
About Celia Smith
Celia Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (7 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (1 paper), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (1 paper), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (1 paper) and Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (92 citations), Spectroscopy (88 citations), Neurology (58 citations), Cancer Research (54 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (101 citations). Celia Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rainer Cramer, Ali Tiss, Stéphane Camuzeaux, John F. Timms, Ian Jacobs, Usha Menon, Nicole Parker, Roderick Clifton‐Bligh, Diana E. Benn and Vivienne Tobias. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Chemistry, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, BMC Bioinformatics, Analytical Chemistry and PROTEOMICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.