Celia Popovic

740 citations
23 papers · 510 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Celia Popovic

22 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Celia Popovic
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Family Practice 33
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 185
  • Education 194
  • Research and Theory 4
  • Health Informatics 5
Replace Anne de la Croix with:
Anne de la Croix Netherlands
Janet Strivens United Kingdom
Mohamed Al‐Eraky Saudi Arabia
Iman Hegazi Australia
Anne Mette Mørcke Denmark
Ellen Tullo United Kingdom
Agnes Diemers Netherlands
Leen Aper Belgium
Jocelyn Schiller United States
Naghma Naeem Saudi Arabia
Celia Popovic relative to Anne de la Croix Netherlands Anne de la Croix's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Anne de la Croix · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia Popovic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Popovic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Popovic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Popovic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Popovic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Popovic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Popovic. The network helps show where Celia Popovic may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celia Popovic, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia Popovic Line = papers co-authored together Celia Popovic links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009342
2 201327
3 201224
4 202017
5 201715
6 201915
7 201611
8 201011
9 20215
10
Creating future proof graduates
20095
11
Understanding Undergraduates: Challenging our preconceptions of student success
20125
12 20164
13 20104
14 20174
15 20154
16 20243
17 20123
18 20123
19 20172
20 20182

About Celia Popovic

Celia Popovic is a scholar working on Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Physiology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (2 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (33 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (185 citations), Education (194 citations), Research and Theory (4 citations) and Health Informatics (5 citations). Celia Popovic has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Sharon Buckley, Khalid S. Khan, Javier Zamora, Sadia Malick, Jamie J. Coleman, David Pollard, David Morley, Ian Davison, Alice S. N. Kim and John Paul Foxe. Their work appears in journals such as Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Medical Teacher, The International Journal for Academic Development, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology and The International Journal of Learning Annual Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact