Celia Brown

85 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Celia Brown's Hit Papers

The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review 2006 · 658 citations
6580+6+13Years since publication200400600

Peers

Celia Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Emergency Medical Services 200
  • Family Practice 48
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 64
  • General Health Professions 459
  • Health Information Management 88
Replace Lloyd Provost with:
Lloyd Provost United States
Patrick H. Conway United States
Arjun K. Venkatesh United States
Patrick W. Brady United States
Mari Botti Australia
John Hickner United States
Edward F. Ellerbeck United States
Mary Vaughan‐Sarrazin United States
Lynne S. Nemeth United States
K. John McConnell United States
Celia Brown relative to Lloyd Provost United States Lloyd Provost's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lloyd Provost · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Brown. The network helps show where Celia Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celia Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia Brown Line = papers co-authored together Celia Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review
Hit paper breakdown →
2006658
2 2011303
3 2007153
4 2008143
5 200298
6 200887
7 200884
8 200860
9 201748
10 200847
11 201746
12 200845
13 201744
14 201941
15 201040
16 201831
17 201827
18 201727
19 201921
20 201621

About Celia Brown

Celia Brown is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Emergency Medical Services and Gender Studies, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Education and Admissions (18 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (16 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (5 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (5 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (200 citations), Family Practice (48 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (64 citations), General Health Professions (459 citations) and Health Information Management (88 citations). Celia Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Richard Lilford, David Torgerson, Noreen Dadirai Mdege, Mei‐See Man, Jon Nicholl, Timothy P. Hofer, Bryony Dean Franklin, Amanpreet Johal, Richard Thomson and J P Nicholl. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, BMJ Open, BMC Medical Education, Medical Education and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact