Celeste De Monte
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Synthesis and biological activity
- Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions
- Click Chemistry and Applications
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Papers in
-
- Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions 9
- Synthesis and biological activity 7
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation 5
-
- Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases 4
- Co-authors
- Simone Carradori (27 shared papers)Daniela Secci (18 shared papers)Claudiu Trandafir Supuran (10 shared papers)Melissa D’Ascenzio (12 shared papers)Adriano Mollica (9 shared papers)Mariangela Ceruso (6 shared papers)Arianna Granese (4 shared papers)Atilla Akdemir (5 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Celeste De Monte
29 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Organic Chemistry 599
- Pharmacology 314
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 92
- Molecular Biology 503
- Biochemistry 43
Countries citing papers authored by Celeste De Monte
This map shows the geographic impact of Celeste De Monte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celeste De Monte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celeste De Monte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celeste De Monte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celeste De Monte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celeste De Monte. The network helps show where Celeste De Monte may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celeste De Monte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 72 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 54 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 54 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 51 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 51 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 43 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 26 |
About Celeste De Monte
Celeste De Monte is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Parasitology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme function and inhibition (10 papers), Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (9 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (7 papers), Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (5 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (5 papers), Saffron Plant Research Studies (4 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers) and Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (599 citations), Pharmacology (314 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (92 citations), Molecular Biology (503 citations) and Biochemistry (43 citations). Celeste De Monte has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Türkiye and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Simone Carradori, Daniela Secci, Claudiu Trandafir Supuran, Melissa D’Ascenzio, Adriano Mollica, Mariangela Ceruso, Arianna Granese, Atilla Akdemir, Bruna Bizzarri and Paolo Guglielmi. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, Current Medicinal Chemistry and Archiv der Pharmazie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.