Current Medicinal Chemistry

7.6k papers and 284.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.6k papers published in Current Medicinal Chemistry in the last decades have received a total of 284.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Medicinal Chemistry usually cover Molecular Biology (3.1k papers), Organic Chemistry (1.2k papers) and Oncology (887 papers) specifically the topics of Computational Drug Discovery Methods (482 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (344 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (260 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Medicinal Chemistry are Mark T.D. Cronin, Harry Morris, Marián Valko, Danuta Kalemba, Alina Kunicka‐Styczyńska, Roger G. Pertwee, Eliezer J. Barreiro, Kuo‐Chen Chou, Catherine Rice‐Evans and Irena Kostova.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Medicinal Chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Medicinal Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Medicinal Chemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Current Medicinal Chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Medicinal Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Medicinal Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Medicinal Chemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025