Cecilia Nardini
Impact in
-
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Papers in
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 5
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 2
- Ethics in Clinical Research 2
- Co-authors
- B. Kozma (1 shared paper)Alain Barrat (1 shared paper)Marco Annoni (2 shared papers)Jan Sprenger (1 shared paper)Giuseppe Schiavone (1 shared paper)Virginia Sanchini (3 shared papers)Giovanni Boniolo (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Philosophy of Science (1 paper)Bioethics (1 paper)Research Ethics (1 paper)Physical Review Letters (1 paper)Metamedicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyNetherlandsSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Cecilia Nardini
9 papers receiving 243 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 122
- Health Informatics 9
- Sociology and Political Science 71
- Communication 11
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 45
Countries citing papers authored by Cecilia Nardini
This map shows the geographic impact of Cecilia Nardini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecilia Nardini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecilia Nardini more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cecilia Nardini
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecilia Nardini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecilia Nardini. The network helps show where Cecilia Nardini may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Cecilia Nardini, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 134 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 0 |
About Cecilia Nardini
Cecilia Nardini is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Physiology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 10 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (1 paper) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (122 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations), Sociology and Political Science (71 citations), Communication (11 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (45 citations). Cecilia Nardini has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Netherlands and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include B. Kozma, Alain Barrat, Marco Annoni, Jan Sprenger, Giuseppe Schiavone, Virginia Sanchini and Giovanni Boniolo. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Bioethics, Research Ethics, Physical Review Letters and Metamedicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.