Amanda Hicks

18 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

Amanda Hicks
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Social Psychology 72
  • Health Informatics 4
  • General Social Sciences 8
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
  • Artificial Intelligence 68
Replace Praveen SV with:
Praveen SV India
Xiaolei Huang United States
Samira Yousefinaghani Canada
Ramya Tekumalla United States
Ashlynn R. Daughton United States
Yuning Ding Germany
Qingyu Yuan China
K Ross United States
Lu He United States
Yue Su China
Amanda Hicks relative to Praveen SV India Praveen SV's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Praveen SV · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Hicks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Hicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Hicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Hicks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Hicks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Hicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Hicks. The network helps show where Amanda Hicks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Hicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Hicks Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Hicks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201669
2 201936
3 201927
4
Training manual for sweet sorghum
200021
5 201620
6 201620
7
Mining Twitter as a First Step toward Assessing the Adequacy of Gender Identification Terms on Intake Forms.
201514
8 201610
9
EVALUATING ONTOLOGIES WITH RUDIFY
20096
10
OOSTT: a Resource for Analyzing the Organizational Structures of Trauma Centers and Trauma Systems.
20166
11 20206
12 20235
13 20235
14 20173
15 20172
16
Ontology of Cancer Related Social-Ecological Variables.
20171
17 20221
18 20201
19
Daily tobacco smoking is associated with retinal detachment surgery failure.
20200
20 20200

About Amanda Hicks

Amanda Hicks is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (8 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (5 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (2 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers) and Topic Modeling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (72 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations), General Social Sciences (8 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (68 citations). Amanda Hicks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jiang Bian, François Modave, Yi Guo, Zhe He, Mengjun Xie, William R. Hogan, Jennifer Woodard, Matthew B. Schabath, Matthew Schlumbrecht and Merry Jennifer Markham. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Infant Mental Health Journal and BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact