Cecelia Brown

1.3k citations
31 papers · 928 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Cecelia Brown

28 papers receiving 758 citations

Peers

Cecelia Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Library and Information Sciences 289
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 214
  • Information Systems 593
  • Information Systems and Management 178
  • Communication 101
Replace Ann C. Weller with:
Ann C. Weller United States
Susan Gibbons United Kingdom
Heting Chu United States
Tom Dobrowolski United Kingdom
Bluma C. Peritz Israel
Noorhidawati Abdullah Malaysia
Jody Condit Fagan United States
Rachel Volentine United States
Carole L. Palmer United States
Simon Wakeling Australia
Cecelia Brown relative to Ann C. Weller United States Ann C. Weller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Ann C. Weller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cecelia Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cecelia Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecelia Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecelia Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cecelia Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecelia Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecelia Brown. The network helps show where Cecelia Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Cecelia Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cecelia Brown Line = papers co-authored together Cecelia Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999131
2 1999106
3 201090
4 200270
5 200370
6 200357
7 200149
8 200148
9 199946
10 200343
11 200841
12 200533
13 201024
14 200520
15 200717
16 201216
17 200412
18 201012
19 200511
20 19988

About Cecelia Brown

Cecelia Brown is a scholar working on Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Management and Molecular Biology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 928 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (12 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (9 papers), Research Data Management Practices (8 papers), Web and Library Services (7 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (5 papers), Library Science and Administration (5 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (5 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (289 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (214 citations), Information Systems (593 citations), Information Systems and Management (178 citations) and Communication (101 citations). Cecelia Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Lee R. Krumholz, Teri J. Murphy, Mark A. Nanny‎, Merinda McLure, Xi Niu, Tara Tobin Cataldo, Bradley M. Hemminger, Michele R. Tennant, Yao Chen and June Abbas. Their work appears in journals such as Science & Technology Libraries, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, College & Research Libraries, The American Surgeon and Scientometrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact