Bluma C. Peritz
Impact in
-
- Library Science and Information Literacy
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Papers in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research 8
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 2
-
- Library Science and Administration 3
- Library Science and Information Literacy 3
Bluma C. Peritz
29 papers receiving 600 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Library and Information Sciences 84
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 259
- History and Philosophy of Science 75
- Information Systems 334
- Information Systems and Management 69
Countries citing papers authored by Bluma C. Peritz
This map shows the geographic impact of Bluma C. Peritz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bluma C. Peritz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bluma C. Peritz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bluma C. Peritz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bluma C. Peritz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bluma C. Peritz. The network helps show where Bluma C. Peritz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Bluma C. Peritz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 83 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 69 | |
| 4 | The Methods of Library Science Research: Some Results from a Bibliometric Survey. | 1980 | 64 |
| 5 | 2004 | 50 | |
| 6 | 1983 | 49 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 29 | |
| 10 | Citation Characteristics in Library Science: Some Further Results from a Bibliometric Survey. | 1981 | 28 |
| 11 | Informetric Theories and Methods for Exploring the Internet: An Analytical Survey of Recent Research Literature. | 2002 | 26 |
| 12 | 1990 | 24 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 22 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 21 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1983 | 6 |
About Bluma C. Peritz
Bluma C. Peritz is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Demography, having authored 32 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (8 papers), Web visibility and informetrics (6 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (5 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Library Science and Administration (3 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers) and Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (84 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (259 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (75 citations), Information Systems (334 citations) and Information Systems and Management (69 citations). Bluma C. Peritz has collaborated with scholars based in Israel. Frequent co-authors include Judit Bar‐Ilan and Yecheskel Wolman. Their work appears in journals such as Scientometrics, Education for Information, Journal of Information Science, Libri and International Journal of Information Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.