Catima Potter

15 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Catima Potter
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 27
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 42
  • Emergency Medical Services 53
  • Health Information Management 26
Replace Linda L. Coventry with:
Linda L. Coventry Australia
Anna Krupp United States
Staci S. Reynolds United States
Patrizia Taddia Italy
Paulo Carlos Garcia Brazil
Laura R. Brosch United States
Leilane Andrade Gonçalves Brazil
Valerie Sabol United States
Ben Glampson United Kingdom
Ana Belén Moya‐Suárez Spain
Catima Potter relative to Linda L. Coventry Australia Linda L. Coventry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Linda L. Coventry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catima Potter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catima Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catima Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catima Potter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catima Potter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catima Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catima Potter. The network helps show where Catima Potter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catima Potter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catima Potter Line = papers co-authored together Catima Potter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2015108
2 201439
3 201537
4 202017
5 201216
6 201815
7 201012
8 202012
9 20229
10
Cancer PROMs: a scoping study
20155
11 20184
12 20204
13 20252
14
PROs for personalized care: patient perspectives on potential use of the long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) in clinical practice
20162
15 20131
16 20230
17 20230

About Catima Potter

Catima Potter is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Surgery, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Pharmacology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (4 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (27 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (42 citations), Emergency Medical Services (53 citations) and Health Information Management (26 citations). Catima Potter has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Vincent S. Staggs, Emily Cramer, Diane K. Boyle, Ronald I. Shorr, Nancy Dunton, Teresa M. Waters, Michael J. Daniels, Minzhao Liu, Naleef Fareed and Eli N. Perencevich. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Nursing & Health, Journal of Pain, Nursing Research, International Journal of Nursing Studies and BMJ Quality & Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact