Emily Cramer

65 papers receiving 993 citations

Peers

Emily Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Research and Theory 113
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 17
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 46
  • Emergency Medical Services 64
  • Applied Psychology 41
Replace Kristiina Hyrkäs with:
Kristiina Hyrkäs United States
Karen H. Morin United States
Joyce Hendricks Australia
Sandra Atkinson Ireland
Debbie Massey Australia
Patricia Hill Bailey Canada
Mary FitzGerald Australia
Ruth Ludwick United States
Giuseppe Aleo Italy
Per Nortvedt Norway
Emily Cramer relative to Kristiina Hyrkäs United States Kristiina Hyrkäs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Kristiina Hyrkäs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Cramer. The network helps show where Emily Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Cramer Line = papers co-authored together Emily Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016187
2 201987
3 201354
4 201853
5 202052
6 201649
7 201441
8 201538
9 201336
10 201634
11 201828
12 201726
13 201723
14 202222
15 202019
16 202017
17 201417
18 201917
19 202216
20 201216

About Emily Cramer

Emily Cramer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Research and Theory and Health, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (7 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (113 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (17 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (46 citations), Emergency Medical Services (64 citations) and Applied Psychology (41 citations). Emily Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Hayeon Song, Nora E. Warshawsky, Vincent S. Staggs, Diane K. Boyle, Catima Potter, Susan McRoy, Ronald I. Shorr, Kelly E. Tenzek, Jessica G. Smith and Danielle Olds. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Nursing & Health, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Frontiers in Pediatrics, International Journal of Nursing Studies and American Journal of Men s Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact