Cathy Weng

43 papers receiving 563 citations

Peers

Cathy Weng
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Library and Information Sciences 30
  • Human-Computer Interaction 85
  • Computer Science Applications 67
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 120
  • Information Systems 217
Replace Leanne Bowler with:
Leanne Bowler United States
Fernando Martínez Abad Spain
Maria Spante Sweden
Steve Krug United States
Gerardo Gómez García Spain
Malcolm Brown United States
Evan Golub United States
Carol M. Barnum United States
Sandra Hirsh United States
Licia Calvi Netherlands
Cathy Weng relative to Leanne Bowler United States Leanne Bowler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Leanne Bowler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cathy Weng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cathy Weng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathy Weng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathy Weng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cathy Weng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathy Weng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathy Weng. The network helps show where Cathy Weng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Cathy Weng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cathy Weng Line = papers co-authored together Cathy Weng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201994
2 201874
3 201554
4 201846
5 202144
6 200836
7 202135
8 201116
9 202114
10 202213
11 202313
12 202113
13 202313
14 202010
15 202010
16 20219
17 20119
18 20249
19 20069
20 20248

About Cathy Weng

Cathy Weng is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 45 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (5 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (4 papers) and Library Science and Administration (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (30 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (85 citations), Computer Science Applications (67 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (120 citations) and Information Systems (217 citations). Cathy Weng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Regina Juchun Chu, Chin‐Chung Tsai, Joanne E. Cox, Jia Mi, Sufen Chen, Eduardo Piedad, David C. Murray, Theerapong Binali, Jia Mi and Yossiri Yossatorn. Their work appears in journals such as Interactive Learning Environments, Education and Information Technologies, Library Resources and Technical Services, Journal of Educational Computing Research and Behaviour and Information Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact