David C. Murray

37 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

David C. Murray
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Library and Information Sciences 15
  • Biophysics 27
  • Oceanography 54
  • Molecular Biology 277
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
Replace Rachel Cameron with:
Rachel Cameron Australia
Pim M.W. Janssens Netherlands
Peter D. Williams United States
Orna Cohen‐Fix United States
Michelle M. Ng United States
Huw Griffiths United Kingdom
Claire D. McWhite United States
Hanna Berger Germany
Dominique‐Laurent Couturier United Kingdom
Vladimir Knežević United States
David C. Murray relative to Rachel Cameron Australia Rachel Cameron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Rachel Cameron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Murray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Murray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Murray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Murray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Murray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Murray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Murray. The network helps show where David C. Murray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David C. Murray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David C. Murray Line = papers co-authored together David C. Murray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201888
2 201982
3 201765
4 197162
5 195741
6 200935
7 201633
8 201732
9 200428
10 198024
11 201523
12 199516
13 201714
14 198912
15 202010
16 20149
17 19589
18 19577
19 20175
20 19575

About David C. Murray

David C. Murray is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Library and Information Sciences, Applied Psychology and Biophysics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (5 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (5 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (4 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (3 papers), Library Science and Administration (3 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (3 papers) and Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (15 citations), Biophysics (27 citations), Oceanography (54 citations), Molecular Biology (277 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations). David C. Murray has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Herdis L. Deabler, Gary Wild, Emily J. Rendleman, Edwin R. Smith, Ali Shilatifard, Mark Wigglesworth, Mei Ding, Catherine Bardelle, Florian Weinberger and Kaiwei Liang. Their work appears in journals such as SLAS DISCOVERY, The Reference Librarian, Biochemical Society Transactions, Acta Oncologica and Cell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact