Cathryn Carson

608 citations
27 papers · 220 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Cathryn Carson

22 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers

Cathryn Carson
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • History and Philosophy of Science 64
  • Information Systems and Management 24
  • General Psychology 4
  • Theoretical Computer Science 3
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 10
Replace Peter Heering with:
Peter Heering Germany
Thomas Holden United States
Alberto Villani Brazil
Richard G. Hewlett United States
Trevor M. Cook United Kingdom
Olga Pombo Portugal
Karl Otto Apel Germany
Ann M. Blair
Hans Poser Germany
Chad Wellmon United States
Cathryn Carson relative to Peter Heering Germany Peter Heering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Peter Heering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cathryn Carson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cathryn Carson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathryn Carson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathryn Carson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cathryn Carson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathryn Carson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathryn Carson. The network helps show where Cathryn Carson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Cathryn Carson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cathryn Carson Line = papers co-authored together Cathryn Carson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201459
2 201434
3 200916
4 199616
5 199615
6 201114
7 20029
8 20029
9
Reappraising Oppenheimer: Centennial Studies and Reflections
20057
10 20047
11 20026
12 20205
13 20074
14 19954
15 20113
16 19943
17 20082
18 20151
19 20141
20 20111

About Cathryn Carson

Cathryn Carson is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and General Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (7 papers), Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (6 papers), German Social Sciences and History (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (64 citations), Information Systems and Management (24 citations), General Psychology (4 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (3 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (10 citations). Cathryn Carson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joonhong Ahn, Mikael Jensen, Shinya Nagasaki, Mary E. Sunderland, W.E. Kastenberg, Satoru Tanaka, Behnam Taebi, Helmuth Trischler, Alexei Kojevnikov and Mary Scott Soo. Their work appears in journals such as Minerva, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Science in Context, Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte and Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact