Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences

327 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 327 papers published in Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (166 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (41 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (38 papers) specifically the topics of History of Science and Natural History (58 papers), History of Science and Medicine (53 papers) and Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences are Evelyn Fox Keller, Наоми Орескес, Elena Aronova, Karen S. Baker, Bruno J. Strasser, Catherine Westfall, John Krige, Tiago Saraiva, Olof Hallonsten and Robert Ε. Kohler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025