Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell

426 citations
10 papers · 379 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell

10 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 220
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 198
  • Molecular Biology 336
  • Electrochemistry 25
  • Sensory Systems 15
Replace G K Wang with:
G K Wang United States
Zhuren Wang Canada
Fayal Abderemane-Ali United States
Yuriy Y. Vilin United States
Jianhua He China
Nicholas G. Kambouris United States
G K Wang United States
Marta E. Perez United States
Isabelle Favre United States
Svetlana Z. Stepanovic United States
Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell relative to G K Wang United States G K Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
G K Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell. The network helps show where Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell Line = papers co-authored together Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1998143
2 1998129
3 201630
4 201627
5 198612
6 198712
7 199110
8 19909
9 19865
10 20122

About Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell

Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (1 paper), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (1 paper), Semiconductor materials and devices (1 paper) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (220 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (198 citations), Molecular Biology (336 citations), Electrochemistry (25 citations) and Sensory Systems (15 citations). Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard W. Aldrich, Ted Begenisich, Ruth Anne Eatock, Leslie C. McKinney, Xiaofen Li, Thao Perry, Arvinder K. Dhalla, Elfatih Elzein, Sridharan Rajamani and Jennifer Tang. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of General Physiology, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Biophysical Journal, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology and American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact