Caroline Wright

44 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Caroline Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Research and Theory 7
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 85
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 149
  • Radiation 55
  • Health Informatics 8
Replace Matthew Lineberry with:
Matthew Lineberry United States
Rylan Egan Canada
Hirotaka Onishi Japan
Raisa B Gul Pakistan
Janet Grant United Kingdom
Edward Caruana United Kingdom
Sharon K. Krackov United States
Cynthia H. Ledford United States
Soleiman Ahmady Iran
Fran Kirby Canada
Caroline Wright relative to Matthew Lineberry United States Matthew Lineberry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Matthew Lineberry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Wright. The network helps show where Caroline Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Wright Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201668
2
Learning style preferences of Australian health science students.
201055
3 200944
4 201536
5 201528
6 201725
7
Managing clinical education through understanding key principles.
201522
8 201918
9 201718
10 201918
11 200916
12 201513
13 202411
14 201011
15 201110
16 198410
17 20049
18 19919
19 20149
20 20209

About Caroline Wright

Caroline Wright is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiation, having authored 52 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (16 papers), Radiology practices and education (12 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (9 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (9 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (6 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (7 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (85 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (149 citations), Radiation (55 citations) and Health Informatics (8 citations). Caroline Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Michal Schneider, Marilyn Baird, Kellie Knight, Brett Williams, Claire Palermo, Ted Brown, N. Singh, Robert Adams, Duane Akroyd and Lisa McKenna. Their work appears in journals such as Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology, Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology, Nurse Education Today, Frontiers in Oncology and Medical Teacher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact