Caroline Wright

1.4k citations
45 papers · 986 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Caroline Wright

42 papers receiving 910 citations

Peers

Caroline Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 115
  • Clinical Psychology 242
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 149
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 72
  • Social Psychology 157
Replace Nathaniel N. Wagner with:
Nathaniel N. Wagner United States
Peter Jameson Helm United States
Charles J. Wibbelsman United States
Giacomo Lazzeri Italy
Maria Kaźmierczak Poland
Manon Girard Canada
Michelle Leon United States
Celso-Ramón García United States
Meredith W. Reiches United States
Heather M. Larkin United States
Caroline Wright relative to Nathaniel N. Wagner United States Nathaniel N. Wagner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.7×
Nathaniel N. Wagner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Wright. The network helps show where Caroline Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Wright Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007146
2 1990101
3 201272
4 200863
5 198961
6 198857
7 201148
8 200646
9 202035
10 201733
11 201032
12 199032
13 200828
14 202124
15 201822
16 197019
17 201216
18 202015
19 198012
20 198611

About Caroline Wright

Caroline Wright is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Clinical Psychology, Insect Science, Social Psychology and Education, having authored 45 papers that have together received 986 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (115 citations), Clinical Psychology (242 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (149 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (72 citations) and Social Psychology (157 citations). Caroline Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include PATRICIA M. E. ALTHAM, Ian Michael Goodyer, Dave Smith, David M. Morris, Colin Peter Sibley, Geoff J.M. Parker, Jon Heron, Matthew Hickman, Ruth Kipping and Alexander E. P. Heazell. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Record, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, BMC Public Health, Psychological Medicine and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact