Caroline Stephens

45 papers receiving 941 citations

Peers

Caroline Stephens
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 91
  • General Health Professions 302
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 17
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 45
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 39
Replace Rosa Baier with:
Rosa Baier United States
Kasia Bail Australia
Ruth Piers Belgium
Inger Johansson Sweden
Stacie Levine United States
Barbara J. Edlund United States
Amy Berman United States
Andrea Kabcenell United States
Jill Scott United States
Lauren W. Cohen United States
Caroline Stephens relative to Rosa Baier United States Rosa Baier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Rosa Baier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Stephens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Stephens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Stephens. The network helps show where Caroline Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Stephens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Stephens Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Stephens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020116
2 200597
3 202093
4 201573
5 200769
6 201938
7 201138
8 201337
9 201836
10 201235
11 201735
12 201533
13 201929
14 202128
15 201928
16 201926
17 201423
18 201821
19 201315
20 201413

About Caroline Stephens

Caroline Stephens is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 48 papers that have together received 990 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (25 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (7 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Disaster Response and Management (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (91 citations), General Health Professions (302 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (17 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (45 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (39 citations). Caroline Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include M. Brian Bixby, Mary D. Naylor, Kathryn H. Bowles, Lauren J. Hunt, Christine S. Ritchie, Sei J. Lee, Elizabeth Halifax, Charlene Harrington, Alexander K. Smith and Timothy W. Farrell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Innovation in Aging, Population Health Management, JAMA Internal Medicine and Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact