Read Pierce

35 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Read Pierce
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Family Practice 12
  • Emergency Medical Services 32
  • Emergency Medicine 39
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 11
  • General Health Professions 55
Replace Victoria E. Forth with:
Victoria E. Forth United States
Rita de Cássia Gengo e Silva Butcher Brazil
Adam Kellogg United States
Lawrence R. Kobulinsky United States
Meenakshy Aiyer United States
George Theodore Somers Australia
Jennifer W. Thompson United States
Enid Hirst United Kingdom
Fatma Cebeci Türkiye
Julie Oyler United States
Read Pierce relative to Victoria E. Forth United States Victoria E. Forth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Victoria E. Forth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Read Pierce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Read Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Read Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Read Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Read Pierce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Read Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Read Pierce. The network helps show where Read Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Read Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Read Pierce Line = papers co-authored together Read Pierce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201631
2 201929
3 201829
4 201525
5 200724
6 201318
7 202118
8 201815
9 201314
10 202011
11 20188
12 20168
13 20158
14 20157
15 19747
16 20146
17 20235
18 20215
19 20175
20
Cognitive Load and Its Implications for Health Care
20185

About Read Pierce

Read Pierce is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 37 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (12 citations), Emergency Medical Services (32 citations), Emergency Medicine (39 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (11 citations) and General Health Professions (55 citations). Read Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Christine D. Jones, Patrick Kneeland, Jeffrey J. Glasheen, Kevin J. Bozic, David S. Bradford, Jonathan Pell, Joshua T. Hanson, Mary E. Anderson, Gurpreet Dhaliwal and Ethan Cumbler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hospital Medicine, American Journal of Medical Quality, Academic Medicine, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact