C. LEPRINCE

404 citations
17 papers · 320 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

C. LEPRINCE

17 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

C. LEPRINCE
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 89
  • Biological Psychiatry 10
  • Physiology 93
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 12
  • Gastroenterology 13
Replace Daniel Tomé with:
Daniel Tomé France
Marilyn S. Petro United States
F. Joly France
Katrin Tomson Estonia
M.D. Ferrández Spain
Masayoshi Furushiro Japan
Canjun Zhu China
Anna-Karin Gerdin United Kingdom
A.K. Majumder India
Viviane L. A. Nouailhetas Brazil
C. LEPRINCE relative to Daniel Tomé France Daniel Tomé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Daniel Tomé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. LEPRINCE

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. LEPRINCE's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. LEPRINCE with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. LEPRINCE more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. LEPRINCE

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. LEPRINCE. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. LEPRINCE. The network helps show where C. LEPRINCE may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside C. LEPRINCE, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. LEPRINCE Line = papers co-authored together C. LEPRINCE links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 199977
2 199951
3 198942
4 198339
5 197921
6 197515
7 197915
8 198015
9 198210
10 19798
11 19858
12 20096
13 19804
14 19784
15 19743
16
[Effect of diet and of the microbial flora of the digestive tract on the intestinal pool and fecal excretion of bile acids in the rat: a comparative study in axenic, ghotoxenic and holoxenic rats].
19761
17 19771

About C. LEPRINCE

C. LEPRINCE is a scholar working on Physiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Oncology, Epidemiology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 17 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (6 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (3 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (2 papers) and Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (89 citations), Biological Psychiatry (10 citations), Physiology (93 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (12 citations) and Gastroenterology (13 citations). C. LEPRINCE has collaborated with scholars based in France and United States. Frequent co-authors include E Sacquet, Michel Riottot, G. Baux, P. Fossier, Claire Ducrocq, L Tauc, B. Blanchard, C.P. Andrieux, Danièle Gadelle and Sabine de la Porte. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal Of Nutrition, Neuroscience, Digestion, Steroids and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact