C. Hooley

3.4k citations
113 papers · 2.0k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

C. Hooley

111 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

C. Hooley
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Algebra and Number Theory 990
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 384
  • Theoretical Computer Science 91
  • Geometry and Topology 665
  • Mathematical Physics 350
Replace Helmut Maier with:
Helmut Maier Germany
J. Van der Jeugt Belgium
K. A. Penson France
S. Ole Warnaar Australia
Vaughan F. R. Jones United States
Claude Chevalley United States
Richard Kenyon United States
David Borwein Canada
Victor Matveevich Buchstaber Russia
Christian Kassel France
C. Hooley relative to Helmut Maier Germany Helmut Maier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.2×
Helmut Maier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Hooley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Hooley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Hooley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Hooley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Hooley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Hooley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Hooley. The network helps show where C. Hooley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Hooley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Hooley Line = papers co-authored together C. Hooley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
On Artin's conjecture.
1967184
2 2019176
3
Applications of sieve methods to the theory of numbers
1976115
4
Recent progress in analytic number theory
198182
5 196352
6 200252
7 200448
8 201048
9 195747
10 200144
11 200942
12 197941
13 199840
14 196739
15 200338
16 196735
17 198834
18 201233
19 197130
20 198429

About C. Hooley

C. Hooley is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Theoretical Computer Science and Mathematical Physics, having authored 113 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytic Number Theory Research (37 papers), Mathematics and Applications (29 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (23 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (13 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (12 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories (11 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (11 papers) and Quantum many-body systems (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (990 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (384 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (91 citations), Geometry and Topology (665 citations) and Mathematical Physics (350 citations). C. Hooley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jorge Quintanilla, Maximilian Schulz, G. M. Luke, Frank Pollmann, Olivier Parcollet, H. Halberstam, Piers Coleman, Antje Kohnle, Bruce Sinclair and David C. Langreth. Their work appears in journals such as Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), Acta Arithmetica, Physical Review Letters, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society and Acta Mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact