David Borwein

105 papers receiving 992 citations

Peers

David Borwein
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Algebra and Number Theory 346
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 185
  • Statistics and Probability 368
  • Applied Mathematics 420
  • Numerical Analysis 178
Replace Helmut Maier with:
Helmut Maier Germany
Richard Kenyon United States
Jay R. Goldman United States
Carl Ludwig Siegel Germany
Irwin Kra United States
Louis W. Shapiro United States
Evguenii Andreevich Rakhmanov United States
Marius Junge United States
C. Hooley United Kingdom
T. D. Morley United States
David Borwein relative to Helmut Maier Germany Helmut Maier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Helmut Maier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Borwein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Borwein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Borwein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Borwein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Borwein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Borwein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Borwein. The network helps show where David Borwein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Borwein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Borwein Line = papers co-authored together David Borwein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995138
2 198576
3 198072
4 199555
5 196537
6 199135
7 197834
8 195834
9 195731
10 195828
11 200127
12 196826
13 200826
14 200525
15 198923
16 198223
17 198822
18 195821
19 198320
20 200117

About David Borwein

David Borwein is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, Mathematical Physics, Numerical Analysis and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 117 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (54 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (15 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (14 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (14 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (14 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (12 papers), Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research (12 papers) and Matrix Theory and Algorithms (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (346 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (185 citations), Statistics and Probability (368 citations), Applied Mathematics (420 citations) and Numerical Analysis (178 citations). David Borwein has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan M. Borwein, Roland Girgensohn, Keith F. Taylor, J. William McGowan, A. Jakimovski, R. Shail, Werner Kratz, Richard E. Crandall, David M. Bradley and J. G. Wan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society and Canadian Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact