C. E. Ng

626 citations
40 papers · 499 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

C. E. Ng

39 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

C. E. Ng
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Oncology 134
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 94
  • Biotechnology 31
  • Biomedical Engineering 144
  • Biophysics 17
Replace J.S. Josan with:
J.S. Josan United States
Luís Lima Portugal
R.F. Murphy United States
Wei-Wei Chang China
Esteban Cruz Australia
Li-Peng Yap United States
Sebastian Fabritz Germany
Sitaram Harihar United States
Donald D. Johnson United States
Jane Mattei United States
C. E. Ng relative to J.S. Josan United States J.S. Josan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
J.S. Josan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. E. Ng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. E. Ng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. E. Ng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. E. Ng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. E. Ng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. E. Ng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. E. Ng. The network helps show where C. E. Ng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. E. Ng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. E. Ng Line = papers co-authored together C. E. Ng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201552
2 201649
3 199437
4 199436
5 202034
6 199422
7 199620
8 202219
9 199316
10 199615
11 199814
12 202014
13 199813
14 199413
15 199613
16 199511
17 201811
18 200111
19 200211
20 199710

About C. E. Ng

C. E. Ng is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology and Food Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (16 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (9 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (5 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (3 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (134 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (94 citations), Biotechnology (31 citations), Biomedical Engineering (144 citations) and Biophysics (17 citations). C. E. Ng has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Taiwan and China. Frequent co-authors include G. P. Raaphorst, Dennis Heller, Dik‐Lung Ma, Chung‐Hang Leung, Modi Wang, Chao Yang, David E. Wilkins, David J. Stewart, Ting‐Ting Chang and Zhifeng Mao. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hyperthermia, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, Melanoma Research, Radiation Research and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact