C. A. Hooker

44 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

C. A. Hooker
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • History and Philosophy of Science 272
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 122
  • Philosophy 90
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 125
  • General Decision Sciences 9
Replace Stephen Leeds with:
Stephen Leeds United States
C. A. Hooker Australia
Kenneth F. Schaffner United States
J. R. Lucas United Kingdom
Storrs McCall Canada
Paul Oppenheim United States
A. S. Eddinǵton United States
Maria Reichenbach United States
Jarrett Leplin United States
Chris Swoyer United States
C. A. Hooker relative to Stephen Leeds United States Stephen Leeds's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Stephen Leeds · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. A. Hooker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. A. Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. A. Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. A. Hooker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. A. Hooker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. A. Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. A. Hooker. The network helps show where C. A. Hooker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside C. A. Hooker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. A. Hooker Line = papers co-authored together C. A. Hooker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198491
2 198173
3 197359
4 197552
5
Autonomy and the emergence of intelligence: Organised interactive construction
200034
6 197526
7 198124
8 200823
9
PSA 1974 : proceedings of the 1974 biennial meeting, Philosophy of Science Association
197621
10 197819
11 199015
12 200812
13 200712
14 199211
15 200710
16 19709
17 19738
18 19928
19 19715
20 19725

About C. A. Hooker

C. A. Hooker is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 51 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (20 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers) and Science and Climate Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (272 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (122 citations), Philosophy (90 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (125 citations) and General Decision Sciences (9 citations). C. A. Hooker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian Skyrms, R. S. Cohen, Joshua Skewes, Robin J. Evans, Wayne Christensen, John Sutton, Scott J. Fitzpatrick, Ian Kerridge, Gerard O’Brien and Robert S. Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Synthese and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact