Bruno Anglès

447 citations
38 papers · 253 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Bruno Anglès

32 papers receiving 218 citations

Peers

Bruno Anglès
Comparison fields: 5 of 8
  • Algebra and Number Theory 179
  • Geometry and Topology 144
  • Mathematical Physics 130
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 1
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1
Replace Humio Ichimura with:
Humio Ichimura Japan
Leovigildo Alonso Tarrı́o Spain
Ana Jeremı́as López Spain
Federico Pellarin France
Charles Walter France
Vinayak Vatsal Canada
Lior Fishman United States
Chelsea Walton United States
Otmar Venjakob Germany
Bruno Anglès relative to Humio Ichimura Japan Humio Ichimura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×19×
Humio Ichimura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bruno Anglès

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bruno Anglès's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruno Anglès with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruno Anglès more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bruno Anglès

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruno Anglès. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruno Anglès. The network helps show where Bruno Anglès may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Bruno Anglès, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bruno Anglès Line = papers co-authored together Bruno Anglès links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201530
2 201429
3 201422
4 201618
5 201617
6 201516
7 200012
8 201711
9 202010
10 20019
11
Arithmetic of positive characteristic L-series values in Tate algebras
20149
12 20026
13 20025
14 19964
15 19994
16 20054
17 20194
18 20204
19 20224
20 19973

About Bruno Anglès

Bruno Anglès is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 38 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Geometry (29 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (27 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (18 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (12 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (1 paper) and advanced mathematical theories (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (179 citations), Geometry and Topology (144 citations), Mathematical Physics (130 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (1 citation) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (1 citation). Bruno Anglès has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Federico Pellarin, Jean-François Jaulent, Christian Maire and David Goss. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Number Theory, Acta Arithmetica, Mathematische Annalen, Inventiones mathematicae and manuscripta mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact