Brian W. Booth

45 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Brian W. Booth's Hit Papers

Biomedical applications of tannic acid 2022 · 171 citations
1710+1+2Years since publication50100150

Peers

Brian W. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Oncology 628
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 38
  • Biochemistry 82
  • Cancer Research 179
  • Biomaterials 120
Replace Soo-Young Kang with:
Soo-Young Kang United States
Chengzhen Liang China
Yifeng Xia China
Badrul Hisham Yahaya Malaysia
Yang Jiang China
Yuning Zhou China
Jorge Martı́nez Chile
Ann Johnson United States
Chenyu Chu China
Weidong Jiang China
Brian W. Booth relative to Soo-Young Kang United States Soo-Young Kang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Soo-Young Kang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian W. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian W. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian W. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian W. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian W. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian W. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian W. Booth. The network helps show where Brian W. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian W. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian W. Booth Line = papers co-authored together Brian W. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Biomedical applications of tannic acid
Hit paper breakdown →
2022171
2 2010136
3 2007122
4 2008110
5 200699
6 200196
7 201887
8 201082
9 201061
10 200754
11 201354
12 200742
13 200939
14
Remodeling of tannic acid crosslinked collagen type I induces apoptosis in ER+ breast cancer cells.
201529
15 200827
16 202125
17 201725
18 200822
19 200721
20 201020

About Brian W. Booth

Brian W. Booth is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Cells and Metastasis (18 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (6 papers), Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds (3 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (3 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (3 papers) and Collagen: Extraction and Characterization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (628 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (38 citations), Biochemistry (82 citations), Cancer Research (179 citations) and Biomaterials (120 citations). Brian W. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and India. Frequent co-authors include Gilbert H. Smith, Corinne A. Boulanger, Andrew Baldwin, David L. Mack, Luigi Strizzi, Linda D. Martin, David S. Salomon, Katharine M. Hardy, Mary J.C. Hendrix and Karen J. L. Burg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Breast Cancer Research, CHEST Journal and Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact