Andrew Baldwin

11 papers receiving 292 citations

Andrew Baldwin's Hit Papers

Biomedical applications of tannic acid 2022 · 171 citations
1710+1+2Years since publication50100150

Peers

Andrew Baldwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 10
  • Biomaterials 68
  • Rehabilitation 28
  • Computational Mechanics 86
  • Molecular Medicine 17
Replace Xiaoting Yan with:
Xiaoting Yan China
Shuo Fang China
Pavel Havelka Czechia
Mir Esmaeil Masoumi Iran
Yongping Lu China
Yicong Li China
Zongcai Zhang China
Mrinal Kaushik India
Mahmoud Abbaszadeh Iran
Andrew Baldwin relative to Xiaoting Yan China Xiaoting Yan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Xiaoting Yan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Baldwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Baldwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Baldwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Baldwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Baldwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Baldwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Baldwin. The network helps show where Andrew Baldwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Baldwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Baldwin Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Baldwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
Biomedical applications of tannic acid
Hit paper breakdown →
2022171
2 202035
3 202019
4 201617
5 202116
6 201816
7 20218
8 20216
9 20223
10 20223
11 20181

About Andrew Baldwin

Andrew Baldwin is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Rehabilitation and Biomaterials, having authored 11 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (6 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (4 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers), Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics (2 papers), Collagen: Extraction and Characterization (2 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper), Optical measurement and interference techniques (1 paper) and Wind and Air Flow Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (10 citations), Biomaterials (68 citations), Rehabilitation (28 citations), Computational Mechanics (86 citations) and Molecular Medicine (17 citations). Andrew Baldwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Brian W. Booth, Rajan Kumar, Farrukh Alvi, Mohd Y. Ali, Luigi Strizzi, Jonathan Naughton, Bizan N. Balzer, Maximilian J. Hartl and Tianshu Liu. Their work appears in journals such as AIAA Journal, Journal of Biomaterials Applications, Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, Shock Waves and Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact